If you're like me, you've wondered that more than once. Articles in bonsai magazines,
professionals giving talks, bonsai blogs and websites, all urge us to use
akadama in our potting mixes. And testimonials back up the claim that our trees’
root systems will thank us if we do. But akadama is expensive (partly because outside of Japan it must be imported.) Is it worth the cost?
 |
"Double Red Line," one brand of akadama. There are others available as well. |
I
had the chance to find out just what it is that makes akadama different, and so
good for plant roots, in a recent live-stream broadcast from Bonsai Mirai. In a word, it’s the structure.
Akadamatsuchi, in Japanese, means “red ball
earth.” Akadama, the soil-mix component, is a clay product, dried
but not fired. (Despite what a label sometimes says.) Like all unfired clays,
it has a good cation exchange capacity,
or CEC. For any unfamiliar with the term, the essential thing to remember about CEC is that the higher a substance’s CEC,
the more nutrients, in usable form, it can hold on its surface where plant
roots can get at them.
But
there’s more to akadama than that. Almost all clays, the world over, are
composed of microscopic plates. The
structure is not very flexible, and when particles swell and shrink due to
wetting and drying, they tend to fracture along the plate boundaries. This
results in a greater and greater number of smaller and smaller particles in a
given volume, and that means an
exponential increase in total surface area within that volume of clay. More
surface area means more water is held. But because of the plate structure of most
clays, the total air space within that volume does not increase along with the water retention. The result: soggy soil.
 |
| Mining akadama in Japan. |
Akadama
is mined in one small area on Honshu, the Japanese main island. There, a
particular combination of soil minerals and heat from subsurface volcanic
activity come together to produce a clay with a structure based on tiny tubes rather than tiny plates.
To
borrow Ryan Neil’s imagery: imagine a game of pick-up-sticks, where every stick
is a narrow tube. Toss the tubes and they come down in a disorganized pile, with individual tubes running every
which way. Now pick up your pile of randomly-oriented tubes and squeeze out
the spaces between the outer walls of the tubes. What you end up with looks like an (oversized) akadama particle.
The
tiny tubes – tubules – are still large enough for the smallest root hairs to
grow into their water-vapor-rich and nutrient-rich interiors. Once a root hair does
that, it keeps growing until it fractures the tube from the inside, and
fractures the particle. The two smaller particles created by the fracture each
have their own tubule systems, and new root hairs emerging from the sides of the
original root hair (now becoming a rootlet) grow into them. They grow thru them, grow large enough to fracture them, and their side-emerging root hairs start to
colonize the new, smaller particles that result – and the process goes on and
on. Air spaces are getting smaller at
the same time, but the root hairs being produced in growing abundance are still
small enough to make use of them.
The
result of all this is a compact mass of densely-branched, thriving roots – just
what is needed for healthy, vigorous bonsai!
Not
all the akadama on the market is of the same quality. Given what akadama costs in many places, it’s a good idea to check the quality of a batch before you buy.
Ryan Neil’s suggestion: look at how much dust is in the bottom of the bag. If
there’s very little dust, it’s good akadama. If there’s a lot of dust – move on.
And
not every plant species thrives in akadama. Common juniper, Juniperus communis, grows thruout the
northern hemisphere’s temperate and cold zones, and can make a very good bonsai
(especially if obtained as yamadori.) But it should never be potted in akadama:
for reasons no one yet knows, akadama is the kiss of death to common juniper.
Sooner
or later, the supply of akadama is likely to be exhausted, and it costs more
than many hobbyists care to pay anyway. What can be used as a substitute?
Diatomaceous earth (horticultural grade) has a CEC almost as high as that of
akadama, and a somewhat similar tube-based structure. Ryan Neil is
experimenting with it in his potting mixes, and others are as well. I’m looking
for sources willing to sell it in small quantities. (No success so far.)
Is
Japanese akadama unique on the planet? Not quite, it turns out. Ryan Neil told
a little story: He sent a bag of akadama to a soil scientist at a California university,
asking for a full analysis. After running all his tests, the scientist told
Ryan that there is one other place on earth (just one) where the mix of minerals and the
level of volcanic heat are such as to produce an identical clay: Mt. Hood,
Oregon. A local bonsai practitioner then went up to Mt. Hood, dug out some
local clay, and sent it to the same scientist for analysis. The result: there
was no difference between that clay and Japanese akadama, none.
Hoodah
thunkitt?
(You can watch the Bonsai Mirai stream “Soils” for yourself, free, at this link. Ryan covers more than just akadama.)
:-) :-) :-)